LOCAL BRIDGE PROGRAM
Trans 213.02 Definitions.
Trans 213.03 Administration.
Trans 213.01
Trans 213.01 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to interpret and implement
s. 84.18, Stats., relating to the method of determining eligibility for funding the acceleration of the reconstruction or rehabilitation of seriously deteriorating local bridges.
Trans 213.01 History
History: Cr.
Register, February, 1982, No. 314, eff. 3-1-82.
Trans 213.02(1)
(1) “
Bridge" means a structure, including supports, erected over a depression or an obstruction, such as water, a highway, or a railway, having a track or passageway for carrying traffic or other moving loads, and having an opening measured along the center of the roadway of more than 20 feet between the undercoping of abutments or spring lines of arches, or extreme ends of the openings for multiple boxes. It may include multiple pipes where the clear distance between openings is less than half of the smaller contiguous opening.
Trans 213.02(2)
(2) “Coordinating agency" means the county which coordinates the submission of applications from eligible applicants within the county to the department.
Trans 213.02(2m)
(2m) “Deficient bridge" is a bridge that is “structurally deficient" or “functionally obsolete" as defined in the federal highway administration's federal-aid policy guide, part NS
23 CFR 650D, par. 9, dated September 30, 1992, attached as appendix 1.
Trans 213.02(3)
(3) “Eligible applicant" means county, city, village, town or combination thereof.
Trans 213.02(4)
(4) “Entitlement" means the amount of aids a coordinating agency will be eligible to receive under this section as determined under
s. 84.18 (5), Stats.
Trans 213.02(5)
(5) “Fiscal period" means the period of time for which the program is being planned, normally 3 years.
Trans 213.02(6)
(6) “Local bridge" means a bridge which is not on the state trunk highway system or on marked routes of the state trunk highway system designated as connecting highways, and is under the jurisdiction of and maintained by an eligible applicant.
Trans 213.02(7)
(7) “Local bridge project" means a project for the design and construction or rehabilitation of a seriously deteriorating local bridge and minimum approaches.
Trans 213.02(8)
(8) “Seriously deteriorating local bridge" means a local bridge which is a deficient bridge.
Trans 213.02(9)
(9) “Sufficiency rating" means a relative rating of the condition of a bridge as determined by the department from inventory and inspection data, as defined in the
Recording and Coding Guide for the Structure Inventory and Appraisal of the Nation's Bridges, December 1995, Report No. FHWA-PD-96-001, prepared by the U.S. department of transportation, federal highway administration, office of engineering, bridge division, bridge management branch, Washington, D.C. 20590.
Trans 213.02 Note
Note: This manual is on file at the offices of the Division of Transportation Infrastructure Development, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, the Secretary of State, and the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Trans 213.02 History
History: Cr.
Register, February, 1982, No. 314, eff. 3-1-82; renum. (1) to (8) to be (2) to (4), (1) and (6) to (9) and am. (9), cr. (5),
Register, July, 1992, No. 439, eff. 8-1-92;
cr. (2m), am. (5), (6), (8) and (9), Register, December, 1999, No. 528, eff. 1-1-00.
Trans 213.03(1)
(1)
Determination of eligibility. A local bridge project is eligible for funds under
s. 84.18, Stats., if it meets the following criteria:
Trans 213.03(1)(a)
(a) The bridge has been determined by the department to be a deficient bridge.
Trans 213.03(1)(c)
(c) The bridge has not been constructed or reconstructed in the last 10 years regardless of the source of funding for the construction or reconstruction.
Trans 213.03(2)(a)(a) An eligible local bridge project under
sub. (1) may be for replacement of the bridge if the bridge has a current sufficiency rating of less than 50.
Trans 213.03(2)(b)
(b) An eligible local bridge project under
sub. (1) may be for rehabilitation of the bridge if the bridge has a sufficiency rating of 80 or less. An engineering study shall be undertaken and funded independently by the eligible applicant that indicates that any rehabilitation would be cost effective, would extend the life of the bridge by at least 10 years, and would correct all deficiencies. If conditions exist that would prevent the completed improvement from correcting all deficiencies, the department may determine if the proposed project is eligible based on safety and the public interest.
Trans 213.03(3)
(3) Application. Application for replacement or rehabilitation funds may be made by any eligible applicant to the county in which it is located. Each county shall establish priorities for proposed projects in the county. Applications for proposed projects shall be submitted to the department by each county, upon notification by the department.
Trans 213.03(4)(a)(a) The proportionate share of the funds available to each county shall be the ratio of the estimated cost of replacing those eligible local bridges in the county with sufficiency ratings of less than 50 to the estimated cost of replacing all eligible local bridges in the state with sufficiency ratings of less than 50.
Trans 213.03(4)(b)
(b) Each county's entitlement shall be computed by adding the positive or negative balance of unused funds from previous years to the proportionate share for the fiscal period under consideration.
Trans 213.03(4)(c)
(c) The proposed projects shall be ranked according to the ratio of the funds requested for the proposed project to the entitlement of the county. Projects within each county shall be listed in priority order as submitted by the coordinating agency. The projects shall then be ranked on a statewide basis such that the proposed projects using the least percentage of a county's entitlement shall be ranked first and progressing to the proposed projects using the greatest percentage of a county's entitlement. Funds requested for multiple projects in a county shall be accumulated in priority order for ranking purposes.
Trans 213.03 Note
Note: The statewide project ranking and calculation methodology is explained in the Program Management Manual, Chapter
06-
02-
08, June 10, 1988. Copies of this document may be obtained from the Division of Transportation Investment Management, P. O. Box 7913, Madison, WI 53707-7913, or by calling (608) 266-5408.
Trans 213.03(4)(d)
(d) A bridge which crosses a county line shall be treated as being 50% in each county unless another percentage figure is determined by the department to be more equitable.
Trans 213.03(4)(e)
(e) Funds shall be assigned to projects in order of rank, starting with rank #1 to the limit of available funds in each fiscal period. The department shall notify the counties of the assigned funding to approved projects.
Trans 213.03(4)(f)
(f) Assigned funds shall be available for projects for the duration of the fiscal period in which they are assigned. Any project not authorized in the fiscal period for which funds are assigned shall lose approved status and shall be requested in a subsequent period if the county wishes to pursue the project.
Trans 213.03(4)(g)
(g) The department may make adjustments to the assigned funds for a project and to the schedule of approved projects within a fiscal period to assure the efficient management of the program.
Trans 213.03(5)
(5) Financial participation. The department shall provide the percentage of the cost of a local bridge project, which is applicable under the federal bridge program administered under
23 USC 144 (f). The remainder of the cost shall be provided by the applicant.
Trans 213.03(6)
(6) Project agreements. Each project which is assigned funds under this chapter shall be the subject of a formal agreement between the state and the applicant.
Trans 213.03 History
History: Cr.
Register, February, 1982, No. 314, eff. 3-1-82; am. (1) (b), (2), (3) (a) to (c), (e) and (f) and (4), cr. (1) (c) and (3) (g),
Register, July, 1992, No. 439, eff. 8-1-92;
r. and recr. (1), renum. (2) to (5) to be (3) to (6) and am. (3), (4) (a), (b) and (e), cr. (2), Register, December, 1999, No. 528, eff. 1-1-00.
